Diblaim
Diblaim is the person named in Hosea 1:3 as the father of Gomer, Hosea’s wife. Scripture gives no further clear information about him.
Diblaim is the person named in Hosea 1:3 as the father of Gomer, Hosea’s wife. Scripture gives no further clear information about him.
A minor biblical personal name appearing once in Hosea.
Diblaim is a personal name mentioned in Hosea 1:3 in the introduction to Hosea’s marriage to Gomer, “the daughter of Diblaim.” Beyond this identification, Scripture does not clearly supply biographical, historical, or theological detail about Diblaim. Because the term is a proper name rather than a theological topic, and because the biblical data are minimal, any extended interpretation would be speculative. The safest conclusion is simply that Diblaim is the named father of Gomer in the opening narrative of Hosea.
Hosea 1 opens with the prophet’s commanded marriage to Gomer as part of the book’s prophetic sign-act. Within that introduction, Diblaim is named only incidentally as Gomer’s father.
No secure historical information about Diblaim survives outside Hosea 1:3. The name functions as part of the narrative setting rather than as a developed historical figure.
Jewish interpretation generally treats Diblaim as a minor personal name in Hosea’s opening narrative, without recorded doctrinal significance.
A Hebrew proper name occurring in Hosea 1:3.
Diblaim has no direct theological teaching in Scripture. Its significance is limited to the Hosea narrative, where it helps identify Gomer in the prophet’s sign-act.
This entry is best understood as a matter of biblical naming rather than doctrine or abstraction. The text supplies identification, not explanation, so interpretation should remain limited to what is stated.
Do not build biographical or symbolic theories on Diblaim beyond what Hosea 1:3 explicitly says. The text does not identify him as a theological figure or provide enough detail for confident speculation.
No significant interpretive debate is attached to Diblaim itself; discussion usually concerns the larger meaning of Hosea’s marriage narrative.
The entry should remain descriptive, not speculative. No doctrine should be derived from Diblaim apart from the plain historical notice in Hosea 1:3.
Diblaim reminds readers that Scripture often names otherwise unknown people simply to anchor real events in history. Even minor names serve the integrity of the biblical narrative.