Gospel of Peter
An early non-canonical Christian writing that retells parts of Jesus’ passion, burial, and resurrection narratives.
An early non-canonical Christian writing that retells parts of Jesus’ passion, burial, and resurrection narratives.
An early non-canonical gospel-like text about Jesus’ trial, death, burial, and resurrection.
The Gospel of Peter is an ancient Christian or quasi-Christian writing, commonly dated to the second century, that narrates selected events connected with Jesus’ suffering, burial, and resurrection. Although it resembles a gospel account, it was not received by the church as inspired Scripture and belongs outside the Protestant biblical canon. The text is of historical and literary interest because it reflects early noncanonical retellings of the gospel story, but it must be read with caution and should not be used to establish doctrine against the New Testament.
The New Testament presents the apostolic gospel in the four canonical Gospels and in the apostolic preaching of the resurrection. By contrast, later gospel-like writings such as the Gospel of Peter are not treated as inspired Scripture and are measured against the canonical witness.
The Gospel of Peter is known from antiquity and is usually placed among early Christian apocryphal writings. It was not received into the canon and was rejected or treated cautiously by church leaders who discerned that it did not belong among the apostolic writings.
The text emerged in the broader world of Second Temple and early Christian literature, where many groups produced narrative, interpretive, or devotional writings. Its existence illustrates the diversity of early religious literature, but it does not alter the canon of Scripture.
The Gospel of Peter survives in Greek fragments. Its language and form show dependence on the style of gospel narrative, but language alone does not confer canonical authority.
It illustrates the importance of canonical discernment and the difference between a gospel-like writing and apostolic Scripture. Its content may also help readers see how early Christians retold gospel events outside the canon.
A text can be ancient, religious, and gospel-shaped without being inspired Scripture. Canonical authority depends on apostolic origin, doctrinal fidelity, and the church’s recognition under the guidance of God, not simply on genre or age.
Do not build doctrine from this writing. Claims about its theology, such as alleged docetic tendencies, should be stated cautiously and not exaggerated. Its value is historical, not authoritative.
Scholars generally agree that the work is noncanonical and early Christian in origin, though they differ on its exact date, setting, and theological profile.
Affirm that the New Testament alone is authoritative for Christian doctrine. Treat the Gospel of Peter as an extra-biblical historical witness, not as Scripture and not as a basis for correcting the canonical Gospels.
It can help Bible readers understand why the church distinguished the canonical Gospels from later gospel-like writings and why historical interest does not equal doctrinal authority.