Dictionary Home / L

Lazarus (Parable)

parable_character theological_term standard

The poor man named Lazarus in Jesus’ parable in Luke 16:19–31. He contrasts with the rich man and highlights the dangers of hard-hearted neglect, self-indulgence, and ignoring God’s word.

At a Glance

A named parabolic character in Luke 16 who represents the poor and neglected.

Key Points

Description

In the parable of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke 16:19–31), Lazarus is the poor man who lies at the rich man’s gate, afflicted and dependent, while the rich man lives in luxury without compassion. After death, Lazarus is pictured as being comforted, while the rich man experiences torment. Jesus uses the contrast to warn against wealth without mercy, spiritual blindness, and unbelief toward the Word of God. The passage strongly teaches moral accountability before God and the seriousness of judgment, while interpreters differ on how far the parable’s afterlife imagery should be pressed as direct description rather than parabolic presentation.

Biblical Context

Luke places this parable in a section that warns against love of money, self-justification, and failure to live in light of God’s kingdom. Lazarus functions as the suffering poor man whose reversal exposes the rich man’s spiritual failure.

Historical Context

First-century Jewish and Greco-Roman settings included sharp social divisions between the wealthy and the destitute. Jesus’ picture of a beggar at a gate would have been immediately recognizable and morally confronting to His hearers.

Jewish and Ancient Context

The parable echoes biblical themes of divine justice, reversal of fortunes, and care for the poor. It also reflects a Jewish concern that the Scriptures already provide sufficient witness for repentance and obedience.

Primary Key Texts

Secondary Key Texts

Original Language Note

Greek: Λάζαρος (Lázaros), a form related to the Hebrew name Eleazar, meaning "God has helped."

Theological Significance

Lazarus illustrates that earthly poverty does not imply divine neglect and that God’s final judgment reverses human assumptions. The parable also underscores the sufficiency of Scripture: those who will not heed Moses and the Prophets will not be persuaded by extraordinary signs.

Philosophical Explanation

The figure of Lazarus helps express a moral universe in which present appearances do not determine ultimate truth. The parable insists that moral responsibility is grounded in revealed truth, not in immediate social status or visible prosperity.

Interpretive Cautions

This is a parable, so its details should not be turned into a rigid map of the intermediate state. The main point is the warning against unbelief, neglect of the needy, and hard-heartedness. Also, Lazarus in this passage must not be confused with Lazarus of Bethany in John 11.

Major Views

Most interpreters agree on the parable’s main thrust: repentance is urgent, Scripture is sufficient, and wealth without mercy is spiritually dangerous. Views differ on how literal the afterlife imagery should be taken, but the doctrinal emphasis should remain on the moral warning of Jesus’ teaching.

Doctrinal Boundaries

This entry should not be used to build a full doctrine of the intermediate state from parabolic imagery alone. The passage supports the reality of judgment and the sufficiency of God’s Word, but detailed conclusions should rest on the wider canonical teaching of Scripture.

Practical Significance

The parable calls readers to compassion, repentance, humility, and obedience to Scripture. It warns against ignoring suffering at our gate and against assuming that present comfort means divine approval.

Related Entries

See Also

Data

Machine-readable JSON for Lazarus (Parable)

↑ Top