Methusael
Methusael is a man named in Cain’s genealogy in Genesis 4:18. He is identified as the son of Mehujael and the father of Lamech, with no further narrative given in Scripture.
Methusael is a man named in Cain’s genealogy in Genesis 4:18. He is identified as the son of Mehujael and the father of Lamech, with no further narrative given in Scripture.
Methusael is a genealogical person in Genesis 4:18, listed in the line of Cain.
Methusael is a brief genealogical figure in Genesis 4:18. The passage identifies him as the son of Mehujael and the father of Lamech, placing him in the line of Cain. Beyond this family connection, Scripture records no deeds, speech, or direct theological significance associated with him. Accordingly, Methusael should be understood as a minor biblical person known only through genealogy rather than as a doctrinal or thematic figure.
Methusael appears in the genealogical list of Cain’s descendants in Genesis 4. The surrounding passage traces the developing family line from Cain through several generations to Lamech and his children.
Genealogies in Genesis preserve family lines that help locate people within the unfolding biblical narrative. Methusael’s name appears in a pre-flood Cainite genealogy, but no historical details beyond the biblical record are supplied.
Ancient Jewish readers generally treated such names as part of the sacred ancestral record, though Methusael himself is not given a major interpretive role in the canonical text.
The Hebrew form is a proper personal name transliterated as Methusael.
Methusael has little direct theological significance in Scripture beyond his place in the Cainite genealogy. His mention helps preserve the biblical record of early human family lines and the spread of Cain’s descendants.
As a biblical person rather than a doctrine, Methusael illustrates how Scripture often preserves ordinary historical names without additional explanation. The value of the entry lies in factual identification, not in speculative interpretation.
Do not build doctrines or symbolic systems around Methusael’s name. The text gives only genealogical identification, so interpretation should stay within the limits of Genesis 4:18.
There are no major interpretive disputes about Methusael in the biblical text itself. Discussion is usually limited to genealogy, name form, and textual genealogy charts.
Methusael should not be treated as a theological category, a moral example, or a typological figure without explicit biblical warrant.
For Bible readers, Methusael is a reminder that Scripture’s genealogies preserve real people and real family lines, even when the narrative does not expand on them.