Dictionary Home / M

Monothelitism

theological_term theological_term standard

Monothelitism is the teaching that Jesus Christ has only one will rather than both a divine will and a human will. Historic orthodox Christianity rejected it because it does not adequately preserve Christ’s full humanity.

At a Glance

Monothelitism teaches one will in Christ. Orthodox Christianity holds that the one person of Christ possesses two complete natures—divine and human—and therefore two wills in harmony.

Key Points

Description

Monothelitism is the doctrine that the incarnate Jesus Christ has only one will. In contrast, historic orthodox Christology teaches that Christ is one person in two complete natures, divine and human, and therefore possesses both a divine will and a human will. This protects the biblical confession that the Son truly became man, not merely in body but in the full reality of human life and obedience. Scripture does not use the term Monothelitism, but passages that show the Son’s genuine submission to the Father and his real human obedience have commonly been understood to support the truth that Christ has a true human will. For that reason, Monothelitism is remembered as a rejected Christological error rather than a faithful summary of biblical teaching.

Biblical Context

The Bible distinguishes between the Son’s divine authority and his incarnate obedience. In Gethsemane, Jesus says, “not my will, but yours, be done” (Luke 22:42), showing real human willing in submission to the Father. The New Testament also presents the Son as doing the Father’s will, taking human flesh, and learning obedience through suffering in his incarnate mission.

Historical Context

Monothelitism arose in the seventh century as part of Christological controversy in the Byzantine world. It was associated with attempts to preserve unity in Christ while explaining his incarnation, but the historic church judged that one will was not enough to account for Christ’s full humanity. The doctrine was rejected by the Third Council of Constantinople (680–681), which affirmed that Christ has two wills, divine and human, corresponding to his two natures.

Jewish and Ancient Context

This doctrine comes from later Christian theological debate rather than from a specifically Jewish background. Its vocabulary and controversy belong to the post-apostolic church’s effort to explain the biblical teaching about the Messiah’s person and work.

Primary Key Texts

Secondary Key Texts

Original Language Note

The term comes from Greek monos, meaning “single,” and thelēma, meaning “will.” The related orthodox term dyothelitism means “two wills.”

Theological Significance

Monothelitism matters because Christ’s redemptive work depends on his being truly human as well as truly divine. If Christ lacks a real human will, then his obedience, temptation, suffering, and sympathy are not fully human in the way Scripture presents them. Orthodox dyothelite Christology safeguards the completeness of the incarnation.

Philosophical Explanation

In classical Christology, a complete human nature includes a genuine human intellect and will. Since the eternal Son truly assumed human nature, he did not merely appear to obey as a man; he truly willed, obeyed, suffered, and submitted as man while remaining fully divine.

Interpretive Cautions

The Bible does not employ the technical term Monothelitism, so the doctrine must be assessed by the whole biblical witness rather than by proof-texting a later formula. Care should also be taken not to divide Christ into two persons; orthodox teaching affirms one person in two natures, with two wills that are never in moral conflict.

Major Views

Historic orthodox Christianity teaches dyothelitism: Christ has two wills, divine and human, in the one person of the Son. Monothelitism was rejected as an inadequate account of the incarnation.

Doctrinal Boundaries

Affirm one person in Christ, not two persons. Affirm two complete natures, divine and human. Do not collapse Christ’s human will into mere appearance or into a passive extension of the divine will. Also avoid any teaching that would make Christ less than fully divine.

Practical Significance

This doctrine strengthens confidence that Jesus truly lived our humanity, obeyed the Father on our behalf, and is able to sympathize with human weakness. It also reminds believers that saving obedience was real, costly, and fully accomplished in the incarnate Son.

Related Entries

See Also

Data

Machine-readable JSON for Monothelitism

↑ Top